header image
Mar 16

Mar 16

Sep 6

I recently had to deal with a (once wonderful) client who wanted to re-negotiate my licensing agreement just before we were ready to sign the agreement with a licensing company.  Not a good thing to have happen at the eleventh hour of negotiations.

A couple of things to keep in mind if you are considering using a licensing agent:

1.     If you enter an arrangement with an agent because he/she is tough and will really look out for your interest, doesn’t it make sense that the agent will be tough when negotiating his/her own agreement with you?

2.     If you try to cheat your agent at the last minute, do you really think the new company that is considering licensing your product is going to trust you?  A good agent isn’t going to tell the licensee what you have done;  he/she doesn’t need to say a thing.  Licensing agents and licensees frequently have ongoing working relationships, so when the agent suddenly is not part of the conversation any longer, the licensee connects the dots.  Your impulse to stiff your licensing agent to save a couple of bucks is just bad business; it will certainly lead to fall-out with your agent and, quite possibly, tank the deal and your reputation.

I work hard for my clients and I don’t get paid until they get paid.  It isn’t unusual to spend two or more years getting a deal done.  When you have an agreement with a licensing agent and he or she has already done the heavily-lifiting for you (whether it’s a mere introduction to the right licensee or crossing the “I’s” and dotting the “T’s” on the definitive licensing agreement), trying to re-negotiate your deal with your agent at the last minute, is very bad karma indeed.

Sep 6

Recently, I met with an inventor who, while passionate about his invention, absolutely did not want to hear what he didn’t want to hear:  I call it the “do not want to know what I don’t want to know” disease.   You see it’s a lot like a serious disease because in the end if you have it and don’t do anything to cure it, it could kill your invention.  Unfortunately, in my travels I’ve encountered more than just one would-be inventor suffering from it.

In the case of this particular individual, every time I tried to tell him “an inconvenient truth” about inventing, his comeback was the same, “I have done all my research and I know this will take off”.

We started out discussing the fact that he’s hell-bent on filing his own provisional patent application and, as you might imagine, the meeting went quickly downhill after that.  As most of my regular readers know, you should never attempt to file your own applications (patent, trademark or copyright) to protect intellectual property.  It is like doing your own brain surgery: once you figure out you what you did wrong, it is too late to fix it.

Next, I learned that he did his own drawings and prototype.  We always tell inventors to do your own version of a prototype.  You learn so much from getting it out of your head and into something 3-deminsional.  However, unless you are a design engineer with experience, you shouldn’t be doing the final drawings or the final prototype.

Next, he told me that he refused to get any market testing done on the invention.  He claimed that he didn’t need any.  Huge mistake.  He has no idea if anyone would even use it, let alone pay for it.

The worst part was when we finally got down to why he had called me in the first place (since he obviously had done everything “right”),  he really expected me to just give him some money.  When I explained that I don’t just give money away and neither does anyone else, he said “well this is your last chance to be part of my venture”.  I chuckled to myself over his simple and uninformed arrogance.

So what about this would-be inventor and his “million dollar” invention?  Well, at this point, it’s clear that he has gone about the entire process in an entirely wrong-headed way.  He will fail because:

1.     He didn’t have a professional search done.

2.     He did his own patent filing.

3.     He did his own drawings and final prototype.

4.     He had no market testing done to see if anyone would pay for, or even use, the product.

5.     He assumed that the world would beat a path to his door.  He assumed that anyone could easily see the value of so great an invention and that he would easily be able to secure the financing necessary to develop, manufacture and roll-out the product.

Each of these omissions in and of itself constitutes a serious inventing mistake; collectively, they can be, and usually are, fatal.  This particular inventor had no interest in learning; simply put, “he didn’t want to know what he didn’t know”.  And, in the end, it’s a virtual certainty that no one will give him money.  He hasn’t done his due diligence and, consequently,  no company will license his invention.

Sep 6

Hi everyone, sorry it’s been so long since I last wrote.  Unfortunately, we had a personal tragedy occur among our inventing group here in Colorado this past May and it’s taken all of our energy and talent to keep things moving along without letting any of the balls drop to the ground.

You see, in May, without any warning whatsoever, Anne Feiler, my dedicated assistant and very good friend, suddenly passed away.  In at least one sense, it seemed to me that writing the next blog entry would be some sort of admission (to myself) that she was really gone.  So, of course, the last thing I wanted to do was to write that next blog.

However, the really amazing thing was, that at her funeral, virtually the entire local inventing community turned out to say goodbye.  In fact, one of my most accomplished serial inventors was beside himself with grief, and inconsolable.  It was a very touching tribute to Anne and it reminded me  again of the important work we do here, and of the difference we make in the lives of so many inventors  …. RIP,  Anne, dear friend, RIP ….

Mar 13

A while back, I blogged about one of America’s enduring strengths: the ability of its people to invent and innovate which, as you look back on the span of U.S. history, is the single greatest attribute that has distinguished us, as a nation, from every other nation on earth.  Given the current state of our economy, I thought it’s appropriate, at this time, to re-post that article to remind all of us, me included, that as long as we continue to prize, encourage and pursue the exercise of that attribute, American’s greatest days are still ahead of us …

 

Invention & Innovation — A U.S. Competitive Advantage in a Changing World

 
Current economic crisis aside, as we are all well aware, the world economy is changing fundamentally at a dizzying pace. Countries like Brazil, Russia, India and China (the “BRIC” Block that we hear so much about these days) are growing their economies at double digit rates, while the U.S. and the various state economies are experiencing sluggish or, at best, mild growth.
 
The American way of doing business has been successfully duplicated at this point in each of these accelerated economies; our traditional competitive advantages (i.e., technology superiority, educated workforce, economies of scale, manufacturing efficiency, etc.) are disappearing as foreign economic fortunes improve and educational and employment opportunities increase abroad. The U.S. economy, for the first time in its history, finds itself under siege by a tidal wave of competition that shows no signs of abating.
 
In light of these developments, as we look to our economic future here in this country, it’s essential that we uncover, or rediscover, ways in which to inject vitality and genuine competitive advantage into an economy that has seen better times. An important avenue for gaining this vitality and advantage is through innovation: and the solo inventor is an essential part of this process. Without him, the process, otherwise controlled exclusively by large multinationals with no local allegiance and with a narrow focus on next quarter’s bottom line, withers and dies. The result is the flight of both capital and prosperity abroad.
 
In the past, American inventors have shown that they know no limits. Any age, both genders, and all races throughout our history have contributed to the creative genius that is the American inventing process. The technology envisioned by American inventors has improved our standard of living and linked us across both physical and cultural divides.
 
Additionally, innovation and the inventing process, along with the inventor himself, have been the key ingredient in driving the growth of the American economy over the past two hundred years. It’s time to revisit this driver and to encourage and support those innovative people who are dedicated to the inventing process. It holds the potential for revitalizing our economy.
 

Here in Colorado, we rank among the top 10 states in patents awarded per capita. In 2005, for instance, residents in the state received 1,972 patents. By The Inventors’ Roundtable’s own count, there are over a thousand active inventors in the State of Colorado..

 

Inventors innovate, and in the process help create renewed prosperity and economic vitality. They are the cornerstone of any genuinely-enlighted, locally-focused, economic development effort. Accordingly, it is important that the inventor survive and, not only survive, but thrive. In order for that to happen the inventor needs the support of the existing business community. That support will return back dividends many times over.

 

The bottom line is that inventors become business owners and employers, create wealth, use the services of other providers and give back to the community. They are both drivers and users of the economy; they both create and consume. They are a vital component of the U.S. competitive arsenal and it’s time for us as a society to once again recognize the importance of the inventor.

Jan 26

I have had several calls from new inventors over the last few weeks asking for direction.  Unfortunately, it seems they want to hear that there is one “go to” place that will do all of the work and then send them lots of money.

If you are in the early stages of your invention, there is no easy “one-stop-shop” that will really help you.  If you think there is, you are only setting yourself up for failure and expensive failure at that.

Inventing takes money, due diligence and perseverance. Each step you complete requires new decisions to be made before you take the next step.

The first mistake inventors make is to assume that there is NOTHING else like their idea in the market place.  I hear it all the time and find out that it’s not true.  In fact the last time an inventor said that to me, I found out that the patent searcher had one in the front seat of her car and had it for several years.  The inventor was so sure, he had spent thousands of dollars on prototypes.  What a waste.  For a $500 search, he would have saved thousands of dollars and stomach lining.

For inventors who can’t afford a $500 search, you really need to ask yourself if you should even be trying to go down this road.  Inventing costs money.  There is no way around it.  Companies don’t buy ideas; they license intellectual property.

I have written about all of this before.  However, it seemed like a good time to  bring it up again.  As I said, I have had lots of calls the last couple of weeks from new inventors who want an easy, cheap way to do things.  It doesn’t happen that way.

One step at a time and  with each step completed, new decisions get made.

One stop shops only take your money and success is only a fantasy.

Good Luck.

Rita

Jan 11

Over the holidays I had a few inventors contact me and ask about reality television shows for inventors and if it was a good idea to try to get their product on one of the various “invention” shows.

TV is about entertainment and ratings. If you or your product makes for good entertainment, you have a chance to get on a show. These shows are NOT about doing what is best for your invention or you. The agreements that are used generally tip heavily in favor of the show and the producers. It is not unusual that you end up giving most, if not all, of your valuable rights away.

Inventing is hard work and there are no short cuts. If it sounds too good to be true, well, it probably isn’t true. You are better off, in the long run, to go step by step and do the work rather than wasting time looking for short cuts.

However, there are a couple of shows with which I am familiar that are actually looking for stories about inventors. The agreement that they use is very fair and they claim no hold on your invention. So, if you are going to consider a television show as a way of promoting your invention, read the contract carefully. Have someone else review it for you. A good agreement should be to your advantage, and not just theirs.

Dec 9

How do you “name” your product?  I have written about trademarks before and this topic comes up frequently in new product discussions.  The name you give your product is very important to your economic success.

Most inventors don’t have millions of dollars to spend branding and marketing a unique name.  Having to educate the consumer is very expensive.  The example I often use is “Apple Computers”.  Forty years ago, no one looked under “apple” in the phone book to find a computer.  Now if you say “Apple”, the first thing a person considers is a computer.  Keep in mind that millions of dollars were spent educating the public that an apple was no longer just a fruit to eat.

You have to consider four things when naming a product.

  1.  Will the trademark office approve it?
  2.  Can you get the .com url address for it?
  3.  If you “googled” the product’s name, would your website link pop-up at all?
  4.  Based on the name, how easy (or difficult) will it be to get your product’s website to appear near the top of  Google’s page ranking system?

A good name is one that satisfies all of the first three items, and does a reasonably good job of helping with the fourth item.

It’s important to remember throughout the naming process that selection of a name for the product has dollar consequences.  You can license a good trademark and receive royalties past the life of the patent.  The consumer identifies with your name not a patent number.  That is why, once the patent expires, the trademark still has value. 

Spend time working on the name of your product.  Have a focus group.  Trying to re-brand a product later on is expensive and difficult.  Take the time now to get it right.  Gather all possible words that can be used and work with them until you find a “wow” name.  You will be glad you did.

Nov 29

I have had more inventors calling to ask me about various invention promotion companies in the last few weeks.  “Good job” for checking into things and asking questions.

You can do some checking yourself and the internet is a good place to start.  If you type the name of the company and add “scam” or “fraud” to the search, anything that has been written will show up.  Keep in mind that what you are looking for usually starts showing up after the first few pages, so keep looking. 

You can also go to the company in question and see where the home office is located and then call the Better Business Bureau for that area.  Not all companies are members of the local BBB, but people who have complaints often want someplace to vent and will contact that local BBB.

Also, the USPTO has a page at http://www.uspto.gov/inventors/scam_prevention/index.jsp. This will help you spot actions that are questionable.

Keep in mind that if you are looking for one company to do everything for you, you are leaving yourself open for scam operators.  There isn’t one “do-it-all” company.  Inventing is hard work and it takes time, money and due diligence. 

Good Luck

Rita

« Previous Entries